Author: owner

Yes, it's been a few days. Because the Lenten practices are not observed on Sundays or solemnities, I figured it would be alright if I skipped posting for the Solemnity of St. Joseph. I was also ill over the same time, so I was grateful for the additional rest.

This is a bit of a difficult topic, especially considering the current climate to claim injustices and violated rights for everything imaginable. Yet it seems as though every time we manage to get one solution settled in place the solution is then claimed to be part of the problem and additional work (and additional money) is required to set it right.

I was listening to one such presenter when I was struck by the constant emphasis on personal autonomy. The presenter proclaimed that true justice would happen when people habitually treated each other as autonomous human beings who can make their own decisions. Now, there are obvious cases where this breaks down: Babies or those grownups with the mental (and occasionally physical) capacity of babies. But that wasn't my initial thought, it was "Where does charity fit in this view?"

I happen to be using charity in a few different senses here, so let me go through and define what I'm saying:

• Justice: Giving to others what is their due. E.g. giving a laborer his just payment for his work, punishing a criminal for violating the law, etc.
• Charity: Willing the good of another. E.g. Ensuring that the laborer is happy in his work, providing shelter to the homeless, or simply cheering for your child at a ball game.

To give a stronger contrast:

• Justice: "He who does not work shall not eat"
• Charity: "When I was hungry, you gave me food. When I was thirsty, you gave me drink"

What is interesting is that justice and charity are not opposed to each other. Justice applies to the obligations that I can claim from others, even to the point of a gun (Don't believe me? see just war theory). Charity applies to the goods that I seek to give to others. The direction of each is reversed. Pursuing one without the other is to court disaster, ensuring that neither goods that charity wishes to bestow nor the rights that justice seeks to ensure are realized. When the two are united, then mercy is possible, where the rights that must be ensured are tempered by knowing the goods that must be preserved and achieved.

However, even this only speaks at the natural level. At the supernatural level, we have a historical event that speaks not of personal autonomy, but self-emptying for the sake of the beloved. This alone would shatter the ideal of "treating persons as autonomous beings who can make their own decisions". It instead demonstrates that we are not merely autonomous beings. We are loved persons who are called to give ourselves in a self-emptying way back to Him who loved us first. "For whoever finds his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life, for My sake, will find it."

"What was his crime?"
A smooth and quiet tone
of one who was bred fine
yet chills to the bone.

"An insurrectionist, who styles himself a king."
That small smile that freezes blood
thinking further torments that would bring
the prisoner's cries in a flood.

"A king you say? He who drips with gore?"
His smile broadens to a mirthless chuckle,
"Go find a robe and scepter"
He carefully wraps his knuckles.

"From that thorn bush will I fashion a crown."
grinning we begin our gruesome task
crossing that bloody ground
doing what was asked.

The prisoner is untied, a reed thrust in his hand.
Round the fresh wounds wrap a soldier's cloak
No, he need not stand.
and spikes of man's production jabbed in the brain with a stroke

We bow and spit, snatch and hit.
yet even with our new attack,
he remained quiet.

Alright boys, let's send him back.

This will probably come across as morbid, but it's true:

Everybody dies.

Edit: If materialism is true or if God is only immanent then this is true.

Another day, another insurrection
They always crop up around this time
This one even got the High Priest's attention
That Galilean? Oh, this is prime.

He came marchin' in with great fanfare;
Got too big for his britches.
Strip him to his underwear.
When we're done he'll need more than stitches!

All right boys, let's get to it.
chain him to the pillar there.
Which tool to use from our kit?
such fun to have, so sad to share.

The lash descends

What, no flinch? don't worry that will happen soon
then three and four, five, six, seven
He's quiet still by heaven
you would think we were hitting him with a broom

Shame on us if we don't make him cry
The others would think we're soft
We cannot bear to be scoffed
So all the harder we try.

Over and over the lash descends
anger, fury, rage, all our might and main
We feel we are going insane
for, from the prisoner, no cry can we rend.

The silence deafens and it roars
enraging us to torment more
until gasping we step back
after giving him no slack.

This question came from a coworker when I laid out my approach to the world. As I saw it, there were four interdependent areas that I operated in: Faith, family, community, and career. My goal was to ensure that I fulfilled my duties in each, and allow each to inform the others. His question completely threw me, as it wasn't something that initially made sense. He then explained that these were all things "outside" of me and he was wondering if I had set time aside for myself. (It's been a while, so I might be getting this wrong). I've spent a few years thinking about it and came to the following conclusion: Everything that I have is a gift. I have no right to "me" time. I've been given a stewardship, and woe is me if it is not in order when the Lord comes. Thankfully, I'm not seeking to do this on my own (honestly, I can't) for He has provided for everything. I pray that when my time comes, I can say like St. Paul, "It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me".

The rising darkness calmed the chaos
That filled the streets of Zion town
The insects chirruped 'round us
as we walked toward higher ground.
Desirous to see the flood of Jewish pilgrims
arriving from all around.

A cry cuts the quiet night.
"Abba!"
"Let this cup pass!"

Peering 'round an olive tree
We struggle in twilight to see
a man in throes of agony.
like one cast out by the tide
fearful of the sea.

Torches! A crowd comes crashing by, arms glittering in the light.
Flowing toward the man, ready for a fight.
A kiss and crash of sharpened steel
The crowd reels.

The man in pain controls the field
And heals the harm from him who wields
Then, calmly yields.

The crowd seizes him and then
flows back towards the town again,
the chaos from which it came.

Thanks to the generosity of my employer, I picked up a brand new laptop and am in the process of getting it ready to use for work. Since it had been a while since I had set one up, I dusted off an old script and spent some time getting it up-t0-date.

As an experiment during the development process, I switched from my usual Vagrant setup to using Quickemu for testing. The entire process was incredibly painless, and I'm now wondering if I should up-end my normal development process to use Quickemu.

For those interested, I've put the bootstrap script up as a GitLab snippet: https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/1756335

Time to finish getting that laptop set up!

I want to expand a bit on the final statements that I made on Trust and Truth. One of the difficulties with having an external source of truth is that it must be independently verifiable, that it must be consistent, and that, as human language and society changes, it must find new ways of expressing the same truths. Giving that role to a Person, even if that Person is God Himself, requires either that He speaks the truth directly to every person, or that He works through other people to communicate that truth. I happen to think that He does a bit of both.

Now, for the first we must start with "Thick" moral realism, and believe that God created us with an innate sense of right and wrong which we can, through contemplation and rational thought, come to recognize and practice. While self-deception is possible, it never truly squashes that sense of right and wrong. Based on this understanding, God has directly communicated the truth to every person, which is why many pagans in the pre-Christian world would agree that a god or gods must be worshipped, elders should be honored; murder, stealing, and lying should be punished, etc. However, this innate sense is not enough.

For the second, we start with the person of Jesus Christ, who claimed to be "The way, The Truth, and the Life". Based on this and other sayings, it is clear that Jesus claimed to be God Himself. All these sayings are written in the Gospel books of the Bible, the authenticity of which is corroborated by a number of other sources. Jesus intended to found a church, saying to Simon "You are Rock and upon this Rock I will build my Church. " He also gave a teaching authority to all the apostles saying "Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations". Jesus also spoke of the Holy Spirit coming to strengthen the apostles and guiding them in the truth after His death. With the selection of Matthias to replace Judas Iscariot in Acts, and the anointing and laying on of hands in the letter of the apostles, it is clear that the teaching authority of the apostles is handed on to the successors of the apostles. Based on this information, we can see that God does communicate the truth through other people, so long as they remain true to what was originally communicated by Christ to the Apostles and by the Apostles to their successors.

All this to say:

1. We do have an innate sense of right and wrong (though we may deceive ourselves)
2. The Church founded by Jesus Christ has the teaching authority needed to correct our self-deception and point us again towards the truth.

This is going to be short, since I need to be up very early tomorrow.

For International Woman's day, I would like to recognize a woman who is truly international: Mary, the Mother of God. She has appeared on all continents, except Antarctica, and has always sought to bring unity all peoples by directing them to her Son. An incomplete list worth looking up.

• Our Lady of Akita
• Our Lady of Guadalupe
• Our Lady of Kibeho
• Our Lady of Lourdes
• Our Lady of Fatima
• Our Lady of Velankanni
• Our Lady of The good event
• Our Lady of Knock
• Our Lady of Cuapa

A line that I've often heard repeated in my industry is "Culture eats strategy for breakfast". The core thought behind this idea is straightforward. No matter the plans laid by the chief executives, the rest of the organization will stick with "The way it's always been done". I always found the culture phrase a bit odd.

A few years ago, I noticed something with the language used within the business world and I haven't been able to unsee it. With the emphasis on developing and improving the culture within a business, many of the words have taken on a decidedly religious tone. Considering that the word "culture" comes from the word "cult" this is not exactly surprising. But considering the large rise of the "nones", that is, those who have no religious affiliation, this is rather surprising.

Some examples:

• In sales and marketing, a new paying customer is called a "conversion"
• In scrum, the core activities of "standup", "Sprint review", retrospective", and "sprint planning" are referred to as "ceremonies"
• I've recently begun seeing references to daily routines before beginning work or a meeting referred to as "rituals"
• Another practice that I've heard about is creating a "sacred space" before a meeting, where people can ask each other how they are feeling.

Now, I'm not against these activities or the use of these words, they have a deeper meaning that too often are left at the surface level. It does lead me to wonder about the direction toward which we are changing the business culture. It also makes me wonder about the current tendency that I see with business taking on more and more humanitarian causes and people acting in ways that would make more sense in a cult than in a business. There is a concerted effort to drive organized religion out of the public square through such things as reducing the freedom of religion to the freedom of worship. However, it would seem as though the goal of ridding society of religion is utterly failing. The individuals in society are turning to another organized entity, businesses themselves, and then placing in them a kind of religious fervor.

Sadly, this is not what business is for. Business is about serving others through work, but not by being a religion itself. No business venture can satisfy the religious needs of the human heart, for as St. Augustine puts it "Oh Lord, our hearts are restless until they rest in Thee". To truly satisfy the human heart, we should instead look to the Church that God Himself built on solid rock and filled with His Holy Spirit.